Tig welding tips, questions, equipment, applications, instructions, techniques, tig welding machines, troubleshooting tig welding process
Least honorable
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:38 pm
  • Location:
    Quebec,Canada

so i just started tig welding about 3 days ago on CRS 1/8x1x6" i use 135 or so amps, feathering the pedal between 100_120
here are the results, any tips?
20160724_190045.jpg
20160724_190045.jpg (31.37 KiB) Viewed 1182 times
20160724_193518.jpg
20160724_193518.jpg (30.38 KiB) Viewed 1182 times
20160725_163610.jpg
20160725_163610.jpg (32 KiB) Viewed 1182 times
20160725_165258.jpg
20160725_165258.jpg (33.51 KiB) Viewed 1182 times
20160726_173439.jpg
20160726_173439.jpg (30.39 KiB) Viewed 1182 times
the pictures are in order of which i welded.
(i did more than these, but i dont want to post 50 pictures :P)

alot of pictures, but i had a few questions. it seems better to dip without stopping, but it looks better when you stop and dip so i assume it is better to get use to dip without pausing with the torch, its what im practicing now. also, does it matter how often you dip, other than the looks of it, looks better when you dip less, so should i dip less when i weld? the second to last one was dipping mid-often and the last one which looks better IMO is dipped less. and i find it easier to pace myself to make look even when i dip less i.e 1-.5 dips a second instead of 2-3. so is it ok to dip less?

last thing: when i feed the wire, i kind of 'lean' the wire on the metal to feed in the puddle, is this ok? i find it better than holding it in midair because when i held it in mid air, i would contaminate the tungsten when i would go to feed the wire when i ran low.

thanks for your help, i really appreciate it.

regards noah.
Last edited by Least honorable on Wed Jul 27, 2016 3:48 am, edited 3 times in total.
Least honorable
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:38 pm
  • Location:
    Quebec,Canada

sorry for the 2 black pictures, i have no idea how to fix it. but all it was is a T joint where i dipped more often than the last picture, here is a similar one,but not as good:
20160726_182153.jpg
20160726_182153.jpg (30.79 KiB) Viewed 1181 times
exnailpounder
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Dec 25, 2014 9:25 am
  • Location:
    near Chicago

Good job. You have the moves down but a couple of your pics show smoked metal. You gotta move along and never linger or you smoke your base metal. A few look MUCH better color. You got it brother...a little more seat time and you're there.
Ifyoucantellmewhatthissaysiwillbuyyouabeer.
Least honorable
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:38 pm
  • Location:
    Quebec,Canada

exnailpounder wrote:Good job. You have the moves down but a couple of your pics show smoked metal. You gotta move along and never linger or you smoke your base metal. A few look MUCH better color. You got it brother...a little more seat time and you're there.
which one looks smoked? the butt joins looks like it now that you mention it, any other?

could it be because the tungsten was contaminated? or was it because i was moving too slow?

and does the frequency of which i dip matter? or is it mostly for looks?
noah
User avatar
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Dec 26, 2013 12:41 am
  • Location:
    Laredo, Tx

It's not really the frequency per say, but it all has to do with the bead profile. You definitely don't want a concave bead. You don't want too much convexity either. Both compromise the strength of the weld. You want a little bit of convexity with a nice, smooth tie-in at the toes of the weld.
Image
Least honorable
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:38 pm
  • Location:
    Quebec,Canada

Oscar wrote:It's not really the frequency per say, but it all has to do with the bead profile. You definitely don't want a concave bead. You don't want too much convexity either. Both compromise the strength of the weld. You want a little bit of convexity with a nice, smooth tie-in at the toes of the weld.

Ok so you want it flat or abit concave then?
I have my filet welds either flat or slightly concave I beleive. the bead profile is somewhat similar to what id get on mig, but abit more concave, ill try to remember to get a side view picture tomorrow


Noah
User avatar
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Sun Oct 27, 2013 10:57 pm
  • Location:
    Big Lake/Monticello MN, U.S.A.

Consistency isn't too bad - several toe areas did not wet out (tie in) to base metal - looks like not enough amps.

Stay 125 or above on 1/8" and motor out - faster travel with more amps puts less total heat into the piece.

It's a balance, you'll nail it eventually :)

I tell people that after the 1st 100 hours of practice on various welds it get easier.
Dave J.

Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance. ~George Bernard Shaw~

Syncro 350
Invertec v250-s
Thermal Arc 161 and 300
MM210
Dialarc
Tried being normal once, didn't take....I think it was a Tuesday.
Least honorable
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:38 pm
  • Location:
    Quebec,Canada

MinnesotaDave wrote:Consistency isn't too bad - several toe areas did not wet out (tie in) to base metal - looks like not enough amps.

Stay 125 or above on 1/8" and motor out - faster travel with more amps puts less total heat into the piece.

It's a balance, you'll nail it eventually :)

I tell people that after the 1st 100 hours of practice on various welds it get easier.
For which pictures are you talking about? The first few I know aren't that good because it was the first day I was practicing, my welds look more like the last one now, is that a good tie-in? Or should I go even higher amperage?
I just don't wana screw it up if it was ok, also..

When i do around that amperage, the top gets consumed too much, ill try again tomorrow, change my angle move faster and ill let you know how it went.


noah
User avatar
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Sun Oct 27, 2013 10:57 pm
  • Location:
    Big Lake/Monticello MN, U.S.A.

Least honorable wrote:
MinnesotaDave wrote:Consistency isn't too bad - several toe areas did not wet out (tie in) to base metal - looks like not enough amps.

Stay 125 or above on 1/8" and motor out - faster travel with more amps puts less total heat into the piece.

It's a balance, you'll nail it eventually :)

I tell people that after the 1st 100 hours of practice on various welds it get easier.
For which pictures are you talking about? The first few I know aren't that good because it was the first day I was practicing, my welds look more like the last one now, is that a good tie-in? Or should I go even higher amperage?
I just don't wana screw it up if it was ok, also..

When i do around that amperage, the top gets consumed too much, ill try again tomorrow, change my angle move faster and ill let you know how it went.


noah
Angle is important - more heat needs to be directed at the bottom piece since it takes more amps than that upper edge.

Yesterday I was welding 1/2" to 3/16" and the direction of the arc was very important as I was near the edge of the thinner piece.
Dave J.

Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance. ~George Bernard Shaw~

Syncro 350
Invertec v250-s
Thermal Arc 161 and 300
MM210
Dialarc
Tried being normal once, didn't take....I think it was a Tuesday.
User avatar
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Dec 26, 2013 12:41 am
  • Location:
    Laredo, Tx

Least honorable wrote:
Oscar wrote:It's not really the frequency per say, but it all has to do with the bead profile. You definitely don't want a concave bead. You don't want too much convexity either. Both compromise the strength of the weld. You want a little bit of convexity with a nice, smooth tie-in at the toes of the weld.

Ok so you want it flat or abit concave then?
I have my filet welds either flat or slightly concave I beleive. the bead profile is somewhat similar to what id get on mig, but abit more concave, ill try to remember to get a side view picture tomorrow


Noah
No, re-read the last sentence of my post. :)
Image
Least honorable
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:38 pm
  • Location:
    Quebec,Canada

MinnesotaDave wrote:
Least honorable wrote:
MinnesotaDave wrote:Consistency isn't too bad - several toe areas did not wet out (tie in) to base metal - looks like not enough amps.

Stay 125 or above on 1/8" and motor out - faster travel with more amps puts less total heat into the piece.

It's a balance, you'll nail it eventually :)

I tell people that after the 1st 100 hours of practice on various welds it get easier.
For which pictures are you talking about? The first few I know aren't that good because it was the first day I was practicing, my welds look more like the last one now, is that a good tie-in? Or should I go even higher amperage?
I just don't wana screw it up if it was ok, also..

When i do around that amperage, the top gets consumed too much, ill try again tomorrow, change my angle move faster and ill let you know how it went.


noah
Angle is important - more heat needs to be directed at the bottom piece since it takes more amps than that upper edge.

Yesterday I was welding 1/2" to 3/16" and the direction of the arc was very important as I was near the edge of the thinner piece.
Update to the previous post: tried setting it at 125 and flooring the pedal to make 100% sure I was doing actually 125, and I got a similar bead to the last picture just looks shinier (the tungsten was probably contaminated on the last bead is my guess)

Here it is:
1469641634120-1563063810.jpg
1469641634120-1563063810.jpg (33.97 KiB) Viewed 879 times
1469641694568521907650.jpg
1469641694568521907650.jpg (21.43 KiB) Viewed 879 times
1469646117713347450387.jpg
1469646117713347450387.jpg (32.4 KiB) Viewed 878 times
The last one is the side view of the bead, only way it would focus is if I put a piece of metal on it and put my phone sideways, sorry for the weird angle.

There a bump on the last one because I didn't have time to taper of, I was burning my hand :lol:




I gave vertical a shot, didn't go aswell as flat, any tips? Same settings as flat, feathering the pedal 1/16 wire.
1469652135782-1689961011.jpg
1469652135782-1689961011.jpg (37.67 KiB) Viewed 876 times
I contaminated the tungsten mid weld on this one
I contaminated the tungsten mid weld on this one
1469652478768-886527332.jpg (38.91 KiB) Viewed 876 times

Noah
exnailpounder
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Dec 25, 2014 9:25 am
  • Location:
    near Chicago

Very good! Better than I have seen from guys around here who claim to be pro's and "have 30 years of experience"
No smoked metal this time and your stack a dimes in just about there. You are now a Tig welder 8-)
Ifyoucantellmewhatthissaysiwillbuyyouabeer.
Least honorable
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:38 pm
  • Location:
    Quebec,Canada

exnailpounder wrote:Very good! Better than I have seen from guys around here who claim to be pro's and "have 30 years of experience"
No smoked metal this time and your stack a dimes in just about there. You are now a Tig welder 8-)
:D thanks, nice to see results after you work hard at something!

only thing is now i gotta practice feeding the wire and positioning my hand comfortably for vertical, looking at how others do it and ill see what i like tomorrow, and ill come back with results and pictures ;)

also, i can do vertical sitting down decently, but when i try standing up, it is abit harder to control the foot pedal more accurately and control the torch smoother, are there any tricks to make it easier to control the pedal more accurately and make the torch move smoother?


noah
User avatar
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Fri May 27, 2016 11:00 am
  • Location:
    Atlanta, GA

Least honorable wrote:are there any tricks to make it easier to..........make the torch move smoother?
noah
Get a tig finger.
Raymond
Everlast PowerTIG 255EXT
Least honorable
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:38 pm
  • Location:
    Quebec,Canada

RamboBaby wrote:
Least honorable wrote:are there any tricks to make it easier to..........make the torch move smoother?
noah
Get a tig finger.
already got one, by smoother i meant to keep it steady going upwards while standing up, and keeping the even arc length, it obviously comes with practice, just wondering if anyone had tips to hold the torch differently, or make it easier, etc,etc.



noah
'Stang
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Sun Aug 03, 2014 11:12 pm
  • Location:
    Rogersville, MO

Least honorable wrote:
RamboBaby wrote:
Least honorable wrote:are there any tricks to make it easier to..........make the torch move smoother?
noah
Get a tig finger.
already got one, by smoother i meant to keep it steady going upwards while standing up, and keeping the even arc length, it obviously comes with practice, just wondering if anyone had tips to hold the torch differently, or make it easier, etc,etc.



noah
Nice looking beads! You are definitely getting there. But, things will be better if you get the mill scale off before you weld. Makes for a much cleaner weld. I know it's not critical for practice-but try to develop good habits to start with. Hope this helps.
Least honorable
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Mon Apr 18, 2016 9:38 pm
  • Location:
    Quebec,Canada

'Stang wrote: Nice looking beads! You are definitely getting there. But, things will be better if you get the mill scale off before you weld. Makes for a much cleaner weld. I know it's not critical for practice-but try to develop good habits to start with. Hope this helps.
its cold rolled, not hot rolled, :|
i clean it with acetone 8-)
Rick_H
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Sat Feb 08, 2014 1:50 pm
  • Location:
    PA/MD

I think for a beginner it looks pretty damn good, steadiness will come with seat time you'll get to the point you really don't feel the torch in your hand.

With welding repetition and practice truly makes you better....
I weld stainless, stainless and more stainless...Food Industry, sanitary process piping, vessels, whatever is needed, I like to make stuff.
ASME IX, AWS 17.1, D1.1
Instagram #RNHFAB
User avatar
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Sun Oct 27, 2013 10:57 pm
  • Location:
    Big Lake/Monticello MN, U.S.A.

Now go back to all your previous welds and add 2 more passes for a 3 pass weld. :)
Dave J.

Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance. ~George Bernard Shaw~

Syncro 350
Invertec v250-s
Thermal Arc 161 and 300
MM210
Dialarc
Tried being normal once, didn't take....I think it was a Tuesday.
fredygump
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Feb 12, 2015 8:01 pm
  • Location:
    Rochester, MN

What I did in school...I started running beads just like Jody always says. I took a chunk of steel, maybe 3/8"x3"x8", and covered it with weld beads. When I got to the edge of the metal, I just turned it on it's side and welded the edge, then across the back. I joked that I was going to make it into a 2x4 block. (Oh yeah, I dunked it in water every so often to keep it cool.)

The photo shows a comparison between the block I started with and what I ended up with. And there is some junk in the background, because I started doing the same process with aluminum and stainless. Stainless doesn't cooperate with this kind of abuse, btw...but aluminum was great. Only problem with aluminum was that I was using a Dynasty 200 dx, and that 200A wasn't quite enough after several layers of weld. So I grabbed another chunk of aluminum tube.

I know it is ridiculous...but it was good practice.
Attachments
bead practice.jpg
bead practice.jpg (51.1 KiB) Viewed 751 times
fredygump
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Thu Feb 12, 2015 8:01 pm
  • Location:
    Rochester, MN

If your goal is to be ready for the "real world", then practice welding in circles (around pipe, rod, tube, etc), and try welding materials of drastically different thicknesses...different thickness materials + gaps is particularly fun.

Shortly after I started my job, just out of welding school, I had the "opportunity" to weld companion flanges onto some stainless round duct. The duct was 16ga stainless, and the flanges were 1/8" angle. And due to the clever design, there was also a 1/8-3/16" gap all the way around between the duct and the flange.

I don't know this for sure, but I have a strong feeling the journeymen had a bet about whether or not I could do it. With the 1/8" gap, I was able to weld it without sugaring the inside of the duct (with the help of aluminum chill block). One guy called it "perfect", obviously surprised (perfect only in the sense of no sugaring). But the 3/16" gap was too much for me at the time.


Anyway, there'll be days... :) Anything you can do to learn how to adjust for unusual scenarios will help you out. You never know what people will expect you to "just" weld together.
User avatar
  • Posts:
  • Joined:
    Sun Oct 27, 2013 10:57 pm
  • Location:
    Big Lake/Monticello MN, U.S.A.

fredygump wrote:What I did in school...I started running beads just like Jody always says. I took a chunk of steel, maybe 3/8"x3"x8", and covered it with weld beads. When I got to the edge of the metal, I just turned it on it's side and welded the edge, then across the back. I joked that I was going to make it into a 2x4 block. (Oh yeah, I dunked it in water every so often to keep it cool.)

The photo shows a comparison between the block I started with and what I ended up with. And there is some junk in the background, because I started doing the same process with aluminum and stainless. Stainless doesn't cooperate with this kind of abuse, btw...but aluminum was great. Only problem with aluminum was that I was using a Dynasty 200 dx, and that 200A wasn't quite enough after several layers of weld. So I grabbed another chunk of aluminum tube.

I know it is ridiculous...but it was good practice.
I don't find it ridiculous at all - muscle memory takes time to develop. Developing it quickly means a lot of practice.

Works great for stick welding too. :)
Dave J.

Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance. ~George Bernard Shaw~

Syncro 350
Invertec v250-s
Thermal Arc 161 and 300
MM210
Dialarc
Tried being normal once, didn't take....I think it was a Tuesday.
Post Reply